The European AI Act is in force. For many international enterprises trading with the EU, it's still a chapter to address. Compliance isn't a cost: it's how serious organisations build solid governance before regulators do it for them.
The AI Act classifies artificial intelligence systems into four risk categories: unacceptable, high, limited, minimal. Each carries specific obligations.
If your organisation uses, develops, or integrates AI systems — even from outside the EU but trading into it — you need to know which category they fall into. You need technical documentation. You need internal governance. You need risk management processes.
Deadlines are progressive. Some requirements are already active. Others kick in over the coming months.
We identify all AI systems in use, in development, in evaluation. We classify them under the regulation.
We compare current state with AI Act requirements. We identify gaps.
We build the plan to close gaps: documentation, governance, processes.
We accompany legal, IT, business through implementation.
Compliance isn't static. We update over time.
As President of the Scientific Committee at AIPIA — recognised by the European AI Alliance of the European Commission — I'm inside the institutional dialogue that decides how the AI Act will be applied in practice across the EU. I bring this into compliance engagements.
Particularly relevant for: UK enterprises trading with the EU post-Brexit, US enterprises with European subsidiaries, Asian enterprises selling AI products into the European market, MENA enterprises providing services to EU clients.